GARP SCR Chapter 6: Aspirant asked questions

Below is the list of various questions answered in this post

Question#1: Is Value at Risk used for Credit risk only?

Question #2: Which is better Carbon Intensity or Weighted average carbon intensity?

Question#3: What are examples of different kind of Risk responses?

Question#4: What are examples of market dislocations that are responsible for Market risk?

Question#5 Explain the case study on CVaR from Chapter 6 of the book for GARP SCR Certification exam?

Question#1: Is Value at Risk used for Credit risk only?

Value at Risk (VaR) is primarily a metric used to assess market risk, which is the potential for losses due to changes in market factors such as interest rates, currency exchange rates, and asset prices. It estimates the maximum loss that a portfolio or asset could suffer over a given period, with a certain level of confidence.

While VaR is not traditionally a credit risk metric, it can be adapted to measure credit risk in a modified form known as Credit Value at Risk (Credit VaR). Credit VaR estimates the potential loss due to defaults or credit downgrades over a specific time horizon at a certain confidence level.

In essence:

• Market VaR : Measures potential losses due to market risk factors.
• Credit VaR   : Measures potential losses due to credit events, such as defaults or downgrades.

Therefore, while the standard VaR metric is not directly used for credit risk, a modified version of VaR, known as Credit VaR, can be utilized to measure the potential impact of credit risk on a portfolio.

Climate Value at Risk (Climate VaR):

• Climate VaR is  an adaptation of the traditional VaR concept, specifically tailored to measure the financial risks associated with climate change. It quantifies the potential impact of climate-related factors on the value of assets or portfolios over a certain period.
• Climate VaR considers both physical risks (such as those arising from extreme weather events) and transition risks (such as regulatory changes or shifts in market preferences towards more sustainable practices). It helps investors and financial institutions assess and manage the financial implications of climate change on their investments, considering scenarios like temperature increases, carbon pricing, and policy shifts.

Question #2: Which is better Carbon Intensity or Weighted average carbon intensity?

Carbon Intensity

Definition:  
Carbon intensity measures the amount of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions per unit of economic output, typically expressed as emissions per unit of investment (e.g., tons of CO2e per million USD invested). It can also be expressed as emissions per unit of product or service.

Pros:
1. Specificity: Provides a straightforward measure of emissions relative to the size or output of an individual company, making it useful for assessing the efficiency and sustainability practices of a single entity.

2. Simplicity: Easy to calculate and understand, as it requires only emissions data and revenue figures.

Cons:
1. Non-Comparative: Does not account for the size of the investment or ownership, making it less useful for portfolio-level analysis where investments vary in size.
2. Limited Scope: Focuses on emissions relative to output, without considering how an investor’s exposure to those emissions might differ based on the size of their investment.

 Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (WACI)

Definition:  
WACI measures the portfolio's exposure to carbon-intensive companies, taking into account the proportion of each company in the portfolio. It is calculated by weighting the carbon intensity of each company by its weight in the portfolio (usually based on the market value of the investment).

Pros:
1. Portfolio-Level Insight: Provides a holistic view of the portfolio's exposure to carbon emissions, useful for investors looking to assess and manage climate-related financial risks.

2. Comparative: Allows for comparison between portfolios of different sizes and structures, as it normalizes emissions based on investment exposure.

3. Focus on Investment Impact: Reflects the carbon intensity of a portfolio relative to the investor's share, aligning with sustainable and responsible investment strategies.

Cons:
1. Complexity: Requires detailed data on emissions and the value of investments in each company, which can be challenging to obtain and calculate accurately.
2. Aggregation Issues: Aggregates data across different companies and industries, which might obscure specific areas of high emissions or understate the impact of particularly carbon-intensive sectors.

 Which Metric is Better?

For Investors:
- WACI is generally more useful for investors, particularly those managing diversified portfolios, as it provides a measure of carbon risk relative to their investment size. It helps in aligning investments with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals and in identifying and managing climate-related risks.

For Company-Specific Analysis:
- Carbon Intensity is better suited for analyzing the emissions efficiency of individual companies. It allows for benchmarking against industry peers and can drive internal improvements in sustainability practices.

In summary, WACI is preferred for portfolio-level assessments and managing investment risks related to carbon emissions, while Carbon Intensity is more appropriate for evaluating and comparing individual company performance regarding emissions.

Question#3: What are examples of different kind of Risk responses?

https://garpscrexamprep.blogspot.com/2024/07/garp-scr-chapter-6-examples-of-risk.html

Question#4: What are examples of market dislocations that are responsible for Market risk?

Large-scale dislocations and re-pricings due to climate risk at the macro level can lead to significant market risk. These disruptions can affect entire economies, financial markets, and global trade, often triggered by regulatory changes, physical climate events, technological shifts, or changes in market sentiment. Here are some examples:

 1. Regulatory and Policy Shifts

# Example: Carbon Pricing and Emissions Trading Systems :Governments worldwide implement stringent carbon pricing mechanisms, such as carbon taxes or cap-and-trade systems, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Impact:

• Energy Sector Repricing: Fossil fuel-based energy sources become more expensive relative to renewables, leading to a re-pricing of energy stocks and assets. This can result in a decline in the valuations of oil, coal, and gas companies.
• Broad Economic Effects: Higher energy costs can increase production costs across various industries, leading to inflationary pressures. Sectors reliant on energy-intensive processes, like manufacturing and transportation, might see reduced profitability.
• Investor Reallocation: Investors may shift capital away from carbon-intensive industries towards greener alternatives, affecting asset prices and increasing market volatility.

 2. Physical Climate Events

# Example: Extreme Weather and Natural Disasters: Increased frequency and severity of hurricanes, floods, droughts, and wildfires due to climate change.

Impact:

• Insurance Market Disruptions: Insurance companies may face substantial losses due to claims from climate-related damages. This can lead to a re-pricing of insurance risk, higher premiums, or even the withdrawal of coverage in high-risk areas, impacting the real estate market and broader economic stability.
• Agricultural Sector Shocks: Crop failures and damage to agricultural infrastructure can lead to food shortages, increased prices, and economic instability, particularly in economies heavily dependent on agriculture.
• Supply Chain Interruptions: Disruptions to global supply chains can lead to shortages of goods, increased costs, and production delays, affecting global trade and GDP growth.

 3. Technological Shifts

# Example: Rapid Advancement in Renewable Energy: Breakthroughs in renewable energy technologies, such as solar, wind, and energy storage, lead to a rapid decline in costs and increased adoption.

Impact:

• Fossil Fuel Asset Devaluation: Traditional fossil fuel-based assets, such as coal mines and oil reserves, may become "stranded assets," significantly losing value as demand for these energy sources declines. This can lead to large-scale re-pricing in energy markets and affect the economies of countries reliant on fossil fuel exports.
• Market Shifts: A rapid shift towards renewables can lead to investment flows into clean energy sectors, affecting stock markets and bond yields. Companies not adapting to the technological shift may face declining stock prices, while those leading the transition may see increased valuations.

 4. Global Economic Realignments

# Example: International Climate Agreements: Countries commit to aggressive emissions reduction targets under international agreements like the Paris Agreement, leading to coordinated global policy changes.

Impact:

• Trade and Tariff Adjustments: Carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAMs) or tariffs on carbon-intensive imports can disrupt international trade, leading to shifts in global supply chains and affecting the competitiveness of exports from different countries.
• Economic Growth Patterns: Countries heavily dependent on carbon-intensive industries may face slower economic growth as they transition to greener technologies, while those investing in green technologies may experience economic boosts.
• Capital Flow Changes: Financial markets may experience re-pricing as investors reallocate capital based on perceived risks and opportunities associated with the transition to a low-carbon economy. This can lead to increased volatility in currency and commodity markets.

Question#5 Explain the case study on CVaR from Chapter 6 of the book for GARP SCR Certification exam?

Please refer to the below link for more detailed explanation:

https://garpscrexamprep.blogspot.com/2024/04/garp-scr-chapter-6-cvar-case-study.html

For more free resources, please click on the Cheatsheet

---

    Why support?