Understanding Climate Scenarios: NGFS's Approach

 The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) is a consortium of central banks and financial supervisors aimed at promoting sustainable finance and addressing climate-related risks. NGFS develops scenarios to assess climate-related risks and guide financial institutions in their decision-making processes.

1. Orderly Scenario:

   - The Orderly Scenario envisions a smooth and well-managed transition to a low-carbon economy. It assumes coordinated policy actions, technological advancements, and market shifts toward sustainability.

Example: In the Orderly Scenario, governments implement carbon pricing mechanisms, renewable energy subsidies, and stringent emission regulations to facilitate the transition. Financial institutions gradually reallocate investments toward sustainable assets, such as renewable energy projects and green bonds.

2. Disorderly Transition Scenario:

 The Disorderly Transition Scenario portrays a situation where climate-related policies are implemented abruptly or inconsistently, leading to market disruptions and economic shocks.

Example: In the Disorderly Transition Scenario, regulatory uncertainty and delayed policy responses result in stranded assets and market volatility. Financial institutions experience increased credit risks as carbon-intensive industries face sudden regulatory changes and asset devaluations.

3. Hothouse Earth Scenario:

The Hothouse Earth Scenario represents a catastrophic outcome where climate change triggers irreversible feedback loops, leading to extreme environmental impacts and socio-economic disruptions.

Example: In the Hothouse Earth Scenario, global temperatures exceed critical tipping points, resulting in widespread ecosystem collapse, sea-level rise, and extreme weather events. Financial institutions face systemic risks as infrastructure becomes obsolete, insurance liabilities soar, and agricultural productivity declines.

NGFS's policies aim to incorporate these scenarios into financial risk assessments and stress tests to enhance the resilience of financial institutions to climate-related risks. By considering the potential impacts of different climate scenarios, financial regulators and supervisors can better identify systemic risks, encourage proactive risk management practices, and promote investments in sustainable and resilient assets. This approach helps align financial flows with the goals of the Paris Agreement and supports the transition to a low-carbon, climate-resilient economy.

Why support?